high court chennai judgement on stone crusher unit

Home > stone >

v. The District Collector | Madras High

v. The District Collector | Madras High

The District Collector Madras High Court (28 May, 2008) 28 May, 2008; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; . the fourth respondent should have obtained permission from the second respondent for stone crushing, but it was not known; . the learned Counsel would submit that insofar as the stone crushing unit is concerned, permission has .

vs M/ on 4 August, 2017

vs M/ on 4 August, 2017

Madras High Court. A.Jayakanthan vs M/S.J.R.S.Crusher on 4 August, 2017 . leasing out his land measuring about 3 acres 84 cents for the purpose of establishing the stone crusher by the partnership firm. . it was contended by the respondents 1 to 4 that since the land in which the crusher unit has been established belongs to the first .

High Court to hear PIL against stone crusher near Rajaji

High Court to hear PIL against stone crusher near Rajaji

 · Nainital: The Uttarakhand high court on Wednesday listed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking demolition of the stone crusher near the Rajaji Tiger Reserve for further hearing on Friday.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

(e) Minimum capacity of stone crusher shall be 20 T/day (f) All the stone crushers which were cleared from January, 1996 onwards shall take all necessary measures to control air pollution from the crushers before March, 1997. All those stone crushers which were cleared from January, 1996 onwards and failed to take air pollution

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

After conducting the study on the stone crushing units which were in operation during the months of September and October,1997 NEERI filed a report recommending that for a single crusher…

High court halts work at stone crusher unit | Hyderabad

High court halts work at stone crusher unit | Hyderabad

 · High court halts work at stone crusher unit Pharma cos alerted on cyber crime With Instant savings account, interactive app, credit card and more, ICICI Bank ‘Mine’ is a complete banking .

K. Dhanalakshmi vs State By: on 16 February, 2004

K. Dhanalakshmi vs State By: on 16 February, 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16/02/2004 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. . Criminal Appeal against the judgment dated 30.12.1996 made in C.C. No.10 of 1996 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram. ! . Six men and five women were employed in the stone crushing unit;

HC acquits all accused in Hangarahalli bonded labour case

HC acquits all accused in Hangarahalli bonded labour case

 · The Karnataka High Court has acquitted a stone crushing unit proprietor and three others accused in the Hangarahalli ‘bonded labour’ case …

M/S. Balaji Crusher & Ors. v. National Green Tribunal

M/S. Balaji Crusher & Ors. v. National Green Tribunal

 · Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has relied upon the judgment of the Madras High Court in Vijayalakshmi Shanmugam v. Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2014 (4) EFLT 417, in which it was held, following L. Chandrakumar v.

Madras High Court ArchivesFree Judgments India : Latest

Madras High Court ArchivesFree Judgments India : Latest

Madras High Court In The High Court Of Judicature At … vs The District Collector on 10 April, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 10.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.10488 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 J.Ramakrishnan ..

Gauhati HC Warns Of Proceedings Against Officers If Stone

Gauhati HC Warns Of Proceedings Against Officers If Stone

 · The Gauhati High Court has directed the Sub- Divisional Officer (Civil), Dhansiri and Deputy Commissioner, Golaghat to ensure that the Stone Crusher does …

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

(e) Minimum capacity of stone crusher shall be 20 T/day (f) All the stone crushers which were cleared from January, 1996 onwards shall take all necessary measures to control air pollution from the crushers before March, 1997. All those stone crushers which were cleared from January, 1996 onwards and failed to take air pollution

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras dated 30.11.1990. According to the 2nd respondent, due to the ambiguity in the subsequently issued B.P.Ms.No.48, dated 09. 09.1998 wherein it was not clearly specified that the relaxation is applicable to the existing stone crushing units, it has only resulted

HC acquits all accused in Hangarahalli bonded labour case

HC acquits all accused in Hangarahalli bonded labour case

 · The Karnataka High Court has acquitted a stone crushing unit proprietor and three others accused in the Hangarahalli ‘bonded labour’ case …

Stone Crusher (P) Ltd,  vs Department Of Income Tax

Stone Crusher (P) Ltd, vs Department Of Income Tax

In this case Hon'ble Madras High Court held that the assessee was engaged in converting boulders into small chips of stones with the aid of labour and machinery it was a manufacturing process and the assessee engaged in such activities is an industrial undertaking 3 ITA NO. 3872/DEL/2009 A.Y. 2006-07 entitled to relief under section 15C (which .

stone crushers and high court of karnataka

stone crushers and high court of karnataka

CPMG / KA / BG-GPO/13/2003-2005 - Department of Parliamentary . Establishment of District Stone Crushers Regulation Committee . Whereas the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka by its order dated: 10.7.1998 in Writ Petition.

State Of Tamil Nadu vs

State Of Tamil Nadu vs

The High Court has taken note of the fact that the appellant's revision had been entertained only on the basis of the judgment of this Court in Atia Mohammadi Begum [(1993) 2 SCC 546 : AIR 1993 SC 2465] , which stood overruled by the subsequent judgment in N. Audikesava Reddy [(2002) 1 …

Varadachari, Par v. The State Of Madras

Varadachari, Par v. The State Of Madras

That was given on an appeal from the judgment of the Rangoon High Court reported in Municipal Corporation of Rangoon v. Pazundaung Bazar Co. Ltd.(2). Under the City of Rangoon Municipal Act the Corporation had power to charge licence fees for private markets.

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K. Manickam | Madras High

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K. Manickam | Madras High

 · The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. N.V Balasubramanian, J.:— This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), and the appeal was admitted on the following question of law:

Tulsyan Nec Limited v. Assistant Commissioner | Madras

Tulsyan Nec Limited v. Assistant Commissioner | Madras

 · It is further submitted that the Gujarat High Court while dealing with a similar issue with reference to the Gujarat VAT Act and the Gujarat SEZ Act in the case of Torrent Energy Ltd. v. State of Gujarat reported in 2014 71 VST 582, held that the provisions of the SEZ Act will have an overriding effect on the provisions of the Gujarat VAT Act .

Case Law Summaries Case Laws on Wildlife Protection Act

Case Law Summaries Case Laws on Wildlife Protection Act

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Civil Revision Petition (PD) Nos. 797 and 1751 of 2002 and C.M.P. Nos. 6358 and 14922 of 2002 . business of stone crushing by using the stone Crushers in S. No. 204/4A of Marurpatty village. In the said suit, the respondent . consider that the cause of action for the suit is the running of the stone crushing unit .

Hem Chand And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 27

Hem Chand And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 27

5. The Haryana Regulation and Control of Crushers Act, 1991 came into effect from 17.8.1992. The provisions of the Act made it incumbent on the owners of the Stone crushers to get a licence from the State within a period of six months in case the stone crusher is already operating i.e. in case of relocation of the stone crusher.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN

B.P.Ms.No. 4 dated 02.07.2004 defined the ‘existing crushing units’ criteria as those which have valid licenses on the date of order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court viz., 10.05.1999 and it was also made clear that no new or proposed stone crushing unit should be located within 500 m from any

Not competent to hear PILs on environmental issues, says

Not competent to hear PILs on environmental issues, says

 · The Madras High Court Bench here has held that it is not competent to entertain public interest litigation (PIL) petitions on environmental issues since the jurisdiction was vested exclusively with th